Government Abandons Plans to Protect Cohabitees
The Law Commission had spent two years working on proposals to give protection to couples who live together. If introduced, these would have set out the respective rights of cohabitees as regards the financial arrangements on the termination of a relationship.
The number of people who are living together in a relationship but who are neither married nor civil partners continues to rise. Many of these people are probably completely unaware that they have few rights in the event of a break-up of their relationship and that such rights as they do have centre around any children of the relationship.
“The problem stems from the fact that, contrary to popular belief, in law there is no such thing as a ‘common law spouse’,” says Rupinder Bains. “Couples who live together do not acquire legal rights and there are no set rules for how their assets should be divided if they split up. With over 2.5 million people currently living together informally, the courts are seeing a flood of disputes about who owns what when such relationships end.”
One common problem is where partners have lived together for a long time but the property they share continues to be held in the name of only one of the couple. If the couple then split up, this may give rise to a claim that the property should belong to both parties. The issues involved are often complex and such disputes can be very expensive to resolve in court. In some cases, people who have made a very substantial contribution to the financing and improvement of a shared home have been left with little or nothing for their efforts.
The review of the law in this area was intended to create more certainty in such cases, but the Government has chosen instead to wait to see what are the effects of planned reforms to the law in Scotland before any changes are made to the law in England and Wales.
“Meanwhile, the position of cohabitees is best protected by having a formal written agreement, which should be made with the benefit of independent legal advice on both sides,” says Rupinder Bains. “This is particularly important where the assets involved are substantial, so that in the event that the relationship founders, a drawn out and acrimonious dispute can be avoided.”
Note
The Law Commission’s Consultation Paper can be found at http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm71/7182/7182.asp.
The Justice Minister’s announcement can be found at http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/announcement060308a.htm
This article is intended for general guidance only. It provides useful information in a concise form and is not substitute for obtaining legal advice.
Get Straight forward, strategic divorce law legal advice!
Need More Information? Try this:
- Redundancy Employment Lawyers North London and Essex
- Divorce Lawyers: Ancillary Relief.
- Divorce Lawyers: More on Who Gets the House
- Divorce Lawyers: How Much Would I Get - How Much Would I Pay
- Taking Children into Care – The Legal Process
- Israel Services
- Divorce Lawyers: Divorce Settlements and Bankruptcy
- London Divorce Lawyers: During My Divorce, What Are The Courts Most Likely To Take Into Account When Deciding My Finances?
- Employers
- Divorce Lawyers: More On How To Overturn Divorce Settlements
- Divorce Lawyers: Care Orders
- Divorce Lawyers: Divorce and Wills.
- Employment Law Advice
- Employment Lawyers
- Divorce Lawyers: Remarriage & Reviewing Divorce Settlements
- Divorce Lawyers: Pension and Divorce
- Divorce Lawyers: Divorce and High Value Asset
- Divorce Lawyers: Family Wealth and Pre-Nuptial Agreements
- Divorce Lawyers: New Child Maintenance Enforcement Tactics
- Divorce Lawyers: Straight Forward Divorce and Consent Orders
|
|













