In December 2008, the European Parliament voted in favour of scrapping the UK’s opt-out. A revised Working Time Directive will impose a 48-hour maximum working week, calculated over a reference period of 12 months. If the Directive is adopted, the Government will have three years to implement it. In addition, the Parliament approved a proposal for all hours when an employee is ‘on-call’ to count as working time, in a majority of cases. This decision was condemned by UK business leaders. The Deputy Director General of the Confederation of British Industry, John Cridland, called the vote “misguided. Trying to ban people from choosing to work more that 48 hours a week is a mistake, and would replace opportunity with obstruction.” However, Brendan Barber, General Secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), welcomed the vote. In his view, “members of the European Parliament have courageously defied the abusers and the slave-drivers over the loss of the ‘right’ to work people till they drop.” There is still a way to go, however, before the revised Directive is adopted. Member states have until May to agree a deal with the European Parliament through the Council of EU Ministers. If no agreement is reached, the opt-out will remain in place.
The TUC has estimated that in 2008, 5.24 million people worked overtime without any extra pay. Whilst critical of the UK’s long-hours culture, the TUC recognises that the recession is making people frightened of losing their jobs and it is inevitable that many of them will be putting in extra hours if they believe it will help protect them from being made redundant or keep their employer in business. The laws on working time across the European Union are intended to guarantee better protection of the health and safety of workers. The issues of competitiveness and cost must therefore be weighed against achieving a sensible work-life balance so that employers and employees can have the flexibility over working hours that they seek.
Employers are advised to consider the likely health and safety implications for their employees of continually working long hours. Not only are tired employees more vulnerable to accidents but also an employer who fails to take remedial action when an employee has made them aware that he or she is suffering from stress as a result of overwork can be found liable for a breach of the duty of care owed to the employee.
|
|
Need More Information? Try this:
- Employment Lawyers: Employing Illegal Migrant Workers
- Employment Lawyers: Breach Of Employment Contract and Gross Misconduct
- Employment Lawyers: Disability Discrimination At Work
- Employment Lawyers: Employer's Liability For Breaches Of Health and Safety At Work
- Employment Lawyers: The Corporate Manslaughter Act
- Employment Lawyers: Redundancies and TUPE
- Employment Lawyers: Effective Date of Termination of Employment
- Employment Lawyers: Wearing Religious Symbols at Work
- Employment Lawyers: Compensations For Discrimination At Work
- Employment Lawyers: Court of Appeal Rules on the Employment Status of Agency Workers
- Employment Lawyers: Entitlement To Sick Pay During Maternity Leave
- Employment Lawyers: Tribunal Claim Time Extension
- Employment Lawyers: Employers And Health And Safety At Work
- Employment Lawyers: Failure To Follow Redundancy Procedure & Unfair Dismissal
- Employment Lawyers: Witnesses In Employment Tribunal











