Call Me Back!

Call us: +44 (0) 20 8252 7373

E-mail Print PDF

Victory for Pre-Nuptial Agreements

Pre-nuptial agreements have been given a boost following a recent case involving a ‘serial divorcee’.

A pre-nuptial agreement is an agreement made by a couple before they marry specifying how their assets are to be divided in the event that they divorce. They are commonly made by wealthy people, especially where the assets of the couple prior to the marriage are very unequal.

However, UK law does not (in theory) recognise pre-nuptial agreements – the argument being that marriage is to be encouraged in the public benefit, so an agreement which presupposes divorce is contrary to the public good. However, ‘pre-nups.’ are having more influence as the courts increasingly accept that they are indications of a couple’s intentions at the outset of their relationship.

In the case in point, thrice-divorced Susan Crossley abandoned her claim to a share of the fortune of her property developer fourth husband Stuart after their 14-month marriage broke up. Mrs Crossley had received £18 million in divorce settlements from her previous husbands. Prior to her marriage to Mr Crossley, she had signed a pre-nuptial agreement stating that in the event of the failure of their marriage, she would receive nothing. Hours before a scheduled hearing at the High Court, Mrs Crossley abandoned her claim, accepting that she had little or no chance of persuading the Court that the pre-nuptial agreement was invalid.

Mrs Crossley had claimed that the agreement was invalid because her husband, whose wealth is estimated at £45 million, had not disclosed to her ‘tens of millions’ of pounds held in offshore accounts. In an earlier hearing, however, the Court of Appeal ruled that the pre-nuptial agreement should be considered by the Court before looking at any other claim Mrs Crossley might have.

Says Rupinder Bains, “The courts are having to cope with increasing numbers of divorces involving wealthy clients, which can take up large amounts of court time, so they are becoming more willing to give weight to pre-nuptial agreements. If you are considering marriage and have, or are likely to have, wealth to protect, a pre-nuptial agreement is worth consideration. Contact us for advice on all family and wealth preservation matters.”

Partner Note

Crossley v Crossley – reported in the Times, 13 February 2008.

This publication is intended for general guidance only. It provides useful information is a concise form and is not substitute for obtaining legal advice. If you would like advice specific to your circumstances, please contact us.
 

telephone legal advice





LEGAL BRIEFINGS

Employment
Employment Law in Dubai: Work hard Pay hard?!
What is its role?Employment Law in Dubai is in fact called Labour Law, but has exactly the same... More...
Commercial
Debt Collectors v. OFT
Rogue debt collectors face tough new rules in a Government bid to improve consumer protection in... More...
Family
Ancillary Relief: Divorce & Finances
With property prices decreasing, delayed lump sum payments in divorce settlements must be dealt... More...
Property
Property Boundaries Disputes
Property boundary disputes may often seem trivial – unless, that is, you become embroiled in one... More...
Wills and Probate
Inheritance Tax And Gifts
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have quietly made a change to their policy regarding Inheritance Tax... More...
Internet Law
Trade Mark Protection – How to get it and what does it do?
If your company has a logo, you can use the symbol ™, together with your logo to receive limited... More...
Press Office
London Lawyers celebrate 2 years of unique Money Back Guarantee offers!
PRLog (Press Release) – Jul 30, 2010 – London lawyers, Bains Cohen Solicitors is celebrating... More...
Recommended law firm

Email Newsletter




telephone legal advice