Call Me Back!

Call us: +44 (0) 20 8252 7373

Protecting Your Domain Name

E-mail Print PDF
internet lawyers bains cohenA German man who gained control of over 1,519 domain names was ordered to release them to a hotel chain by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).

The InterContinental Hotels Group (IHG) brought the action after it discovered that domain names which corresponded with their Brand were being used by Daniel Kirchhof to generate cash for his internet hotel booking business by offering customers to the opportunity to book rooms in hotels which were not even connected to the IHG group.

IHG argued that using their intellectual property, Mr Kirchhof was promoting their competitors The case also confirmed 2 important issues; namely that it is acceptable to bundle together more than one dispute against a single person and deal with the lot in one single case, and also that it was acceptable to bring a joint claim by more than one company, provided there is a ‘common grievance’.

The ruling stated that "the inclusion of multiple complainants in this case is acceptable," and that "there is clearly a common grievance on the part of both [companies], and despite the extremely large and unprecedented number of disputed domain names, it would be procedurally efficient to deal with all matters in the one proceeding given the almost identical facts among them."

The WIPO has the power to order the transfer of a domain if the owner is able to show that:

1. The name is identical or confusingly similar to terms that it has rights to;

2. That the person who owns it has no rights to the domain name; and

3. That it was registered and is being used in bad faith.


If you are aware of a third party passing off your trade mark by attempting to attract internet users through misuse of your trade mark to promote goods and services competitive to yours, then you might be able to stop them from doing so by asking the WIPO for an appropriate ruling. In the InterContinental Hotels case Mr Kirchhof had engaged in a pattern of registering domain names in order to prevent a trade mark owner from reflecting their mark in a corresponding domain name. The WIPO has confirmed the position that this was not acceptable. This was an example of a case of bulk registration strategy to which the WIPO found to be unacceptable.



 

telephone legal advice





INTERNET LAW BRIEFINGS

Who Is Responsible For Online Defamation?
Because under English law legal action is possible against all intervening persons who are responsible for repeating, publishing or otherwise... More...
Who Owns Your Domain Name?
So many companies don’t own their own domain name. They think they do, but they don’t. Very often the owner of the domain name is not you but... More...
Digital Economy Bill & Illegal File Sharing.
The Government's proposals regarding illegal filesharers, who repeatedly pirate material from artists such as Lady Gaga, have been confirmed in the... More...
ICO serves enforcement notice on Labour Party
The ICO has served an enforcement notice on the Labour Party after it breached the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). The... More...
Protecting Your Domain Name
A German man who gained control of over 1,519 domain names was ordered to release them to a hotel chain by the World Intellectual Property... More...
Defamation through emails
The number one form of written communication, the Email has become such a quick and easy medium so many of us are making the mistake of treating our... More...
A Quick Guide To Copyright Law
The governing copyright stfatute in the UK is the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. This law offers copyright protection in the following... More...
Trade Mark Protection – How to get it and what does it do?
If your company has a logo, you can use the symbol ™, together with your logo to receive limited intellectual property protection. In effect, the... More...
How I rumbled the lying professor
How I rumbled the lying professor: The story behind the discredited don who rubbished rivals on Amazon...then left his own wife to take the blame.By... More...
Court issues disclosure orders against Microsoft and CompuServe to hand over customer’s account information.
In the first case of its kind the High Court in London was tasked with protecting the reputation of a company, Takenaka UK Ltd against the spread of... More...
Recommended law firm





telephone legal advice