The Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 prohibit victimisation and harassment as well as other forms of discrimination in the workplace based on sexual orientation.In the Regulations, ‘sexual orientation’ covers sexual orientation towards either persons of the same sex, persons of the opposite sex or persons of the same sex and of the opposite sex. It is therefore unlawful to discriminate against a straight person because he or she is straight as well as it being unlawful to discriminate against a gay man or a lesbian because he or she is homosexual, as a recent case illustrates.
Sharon Legg, a married mother of three children, worked as head of security at a gay nightclub in Bournemouth. She was sacked after a dispute with a colleague and brought a claim of unfair dismissal as well as harassment under the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations. She claimed that she had frequently been subjected to abuse because she was not a lesbian.
The Employment Tribunal (ET) awarded Mrs Legg £3,222 compensation for unfair dismissal because she had been dismissed without the statutory procedures being followed. It also awarded her £3,000 in compensation for harassment on account of the treatment she had endured because she was straight. However, the ET did not find that she was dismissed because she was heterosexual.
A spokesman for Rubyz, the owners of the nightclub, said that whilst the company accepted that Mrs Legg had been dismissed without proper procedures having been followed, it has a zero-tolerance attitude towards any kind of discrimination and is therefore considering an appeal against this decision.
Employers are reminded of the importance of ensuring they have, and follow scrupulously, policies and procedures preventing unlawful discrimination. There is no statutory limit to the amount of compensation a Tribunal can order to be paid to a person who brings a successful claim.
ACAS has useful guidance on this subject, for both employers and employees, which can be found at http://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/a/8/guide_sexualO_1.pdf.
|
|
Need More Information? Try this:
- Employment Lawyers: Court of Appeal Rules on the Employment Status of Agency Workers
- Employment Lawyers: Working Hours Law
- Employment Lawyers: Unfair Dismissal and Retirement on Grounds of Ill Health
- Employment Lawyers: Effective Date of Termination of Employment
- Employment Lawyers: Sex Discrimination In The Army
- Employment Lawyers: Equal Pay Claims
- Employment Lawyers: Employment Law in Dubai - The Basics
- Employment Lawyers: Failure To Follow Redundancy Procedure & Unfair Dismissal
- Employment Lawyers: Redundancies and TUPE
- Employment Lawyers: Disciplinary Warnings and Unfair Dismissal
- Employment Lawyers: Unfair Dismissal of a Teacher and Continuance of Employment
- Employment Lawyers: TUPE and ‘Off-shoring’
- Workers on Long-Term Sick Leave – Advocate General’s Opinion
- Employment Lawyers: Employers And Health And Safety At Work
- Employment Lawyers: Illegal Working and Unfair Dismissal
- Employment Lawyers: Discrimination At Work
- Employment Lawyers: Employing Illegal Migrant Workers
- Employment Lawyers: The Corporate Manslaughter Act
- Employment Lawyers: Whistleblower Protection & Unfair Dismissal
- Employment Lawyers: employment Tribunal Awards
- Employment Lawyers: Wearing Religious Symbols at Work
- Employment Lawyers: Employment Law And Health And Safety
- Employment Lawyers: Unfair Dismissal and Alcohol Policy
- Employment Lawyers: Employer's Liability For Breaches Of Health and Safety At Work
- Employment Lawyers: Employment Tribunal Awards











