Call me back!

Name:

Telephone number:

I am interested in discussing

Please call me in the

We always try to call you when it is most convenient for you. In some cases this may be the next business day.

Call us: +44 (0) 20 8252 7373
 

Uncertainty Prevents Revision of Divorce Arrangements

Legal Briefings

Employment

Don’t place yourself in this position ever again!!!

Now, you that you have been made redundant, you might want to think twice about the concept of ‘job security’ More

Commercial

Debt Collectors – Better Protection for Consumers

Rogue debt collectors face tough new rules in a Government bid to improve consumer protection in this contentious area. This is because of changes to the Consumer Credit Act 2006 (CCA) which More

Family

No Trust Created Where Intentions Not Clear

When a couple’s conduct over a period of time is consistent with co-ownership of a property, it might More

Property

Selling Your Property at Auction

Well before the auction is planned, make sure you put together the necessary documentation, such as More

Wills and Probate

A Promise is a Promise

A woman who was widowed mere hours after getting married has been ordered More

More News
 

One factor that comes into play when decisions are being made about the financial arrangements following a divorce is the earning capacity of the couple.

 

A problem that can arise in such cases is what to do when the earning capacity of one of the ex-spouses is uncertain. In a recent case, which also involved a number of other issues, the wife of an airline pilot went to court over the level of the maintenance payments she received.

 

Her ex-husband had suffered a severe depressive illness and he had been suspended from flying duties by his airline. The financial arrangements made in the District Court took account of the uncertainty of his future employment prospects.

 

Some time later, his condition appeared to improve and he was able to return to ground duties, receiving a captain’s basic salary. An occupational physician’s report concluded that it was possible that he might be able to return to flying duties in due course.

 

The Court of Appeal, however, concluded that the uncertainty surrounding the man’s future employment had to be taken into account. His current earnings were no guide to his future level of earnings. The original decision regarding the division of assets therefore had to stand.

 

Says Rupinder Bains, “This decision will be of interest to anyone in similar circumstances and indicates that in the absence of hard and fast evidence of changed circumstances, an appeal is unlikely to change the considered decision of the judge in a lower court.”

 

 

Partner Note

Vaughan v Vaughan [2007] EWCA 1085.

 

 

This publication is intended for general guidance only. It provides useful information is a concise form and is not substitute for obtaining legal advice. If you would like advice specific to your circumstances, please contact us.

 
 
 
About us Legal services Contact us Home
 

© 2008 Bains Cohen LLP